Saturday, September 24, 2005

The Republicans Stole Ohio and the 2004 Election

A must read, the story of how the Republicans stole Ohio and therefore the 2004 Presidential Election, with the blessing of their good and great friends the corporate media:

None Dare Call It Stolen
Ohio, the election, and America's servile press


The press has had little to say about most of the strange details of the election—except, that is, to ridicule all efforts to discuss them. This animus appeared soon after November 2, in a spate of caustic articles dismissing any critical discussion of the outcome as crazed speculation: “Election paranoia surfaces: Conspiracy theorists call results rigged,” chuckled the Baltimore Sun on November 5. “Internet Buzz on Vote Fraud Is Dismissed,” proclaimed the Boston Globe on November 10. “Latest Conspiracy Theory—Kerry Won—Hits the Ether,” the Washington Post chortled on November 11. The New York Times weighed in with “Vote Fraud Theories, Spread by Blogs, Are Quickly Buried”—making mock not only of the “post-election theorizing” but of cyberspace itself, the fons et origo of all such loony tunes, according to the Times.

Such was the news that most Americans received. Although the tone was scientific, “realistic,” skeptical, and “middle-of-the-road,” the explanations offered by the press were weak and immaterial. It was as if they were reporting from inside a forest fire without acknowledging the fire, except to keep insisting that there was no fire.[2] Since Kerry has conceded, they argued, and since “no smoking gun” had come to light, there was no story to report. This is an oddly passive argument. Even so, the evidence that something went extremely wrong last fall is copious, and not hard to find. Much of it was noted at the time, albeit by local papers and haphazardly. Concerning the decisive contest in Ohio, the evidence is lucidly compiled in a single congressional report, which, for the last half-year, has been available to anyone inclined to read it. It is a veritable arsenal of “smoking guns”—and yet its findings may be less extraordinary than the fact that no one in this country seems to care about them.


Here's the Conyers report (pdf file, requires Adobe reader)

and the Executive Summary of the Conyers report, from truthout.org.

1 comment:

Ma Tiny said...

i don't think it was stolen, honestly. but according to the media, anyone who dared to point out that all the machines that erred, erred in bush's favor, was a "conspiracy theorist."

i actually stopped reading salon nov. 3 or 4, when farhad manjoo jumped on the bandwagon of making the doubters feel crazy.